Disclosure

Site search


  • Web Virtual Economics

Community

Syndication (RSS)

  • Subscribe in Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to Google Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add to netvibes

Syndication (email)

  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

Integration

Links to this blog

Books I've been reading

« Gender divide over the Macbook Air? | Main | Who should you vote for? »

A case for a hypothecated poll tax?

Over at the Telegraph Shane Richmond comments on private-sector media workers' antipathy to the BBC's funding structure that "there can't be many other industries in which you're legally obliged to fund a major competitor to the tune of £135.50 per year."

And the more I think about it the politically odder the funding structure for that unique British institution (that Mencius insightfully calls the Department of Journalism) appears. It's a hypothecated poll tax. That is, a flat fee levied per head of population by the government to meet a specific spending objective.

Which to say the least is something of a political anomaly, since
anyone who paid even the scantest attention to the political climate of the early 1980s would presumably concur that the current government would run a long, long way from the implication that it operated a poll tax, and our current administration has consistently opposed hypothecated taxation for all sorts of other purposes on grounds that, according to our last PM, "a hypothecated tax is still a tax that comes out of general taxation". Every schoolboy knows that poll taxes are regressive and end with rioting in the streets. Even our last PM knew that the money collected into the public purse is all the same money, however you describe it, cut it or spin it. And yet.   

(Yes, technically the license fee isn't quite the same as a tax because in theory you can opt out by not owning a television, a strategy I pursued for about five years back in the early 90s. Still, acquaintances who live without a television to this day report that the license detection people react with often aggressive incredulity to the claim that there's no TV in the house, and from my limited experience the choice to go TV-free is sufficiently concentrated in the upper demographics as to merely exacerbate the regressive impact of the levy.)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5b7853ef00e54fe352be8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A case for a hypothecated poll tax? :

Comments

Do your acquaintances know you think them posh ;) ?

Hi Ross

I think the ones who make a big deal about not owning a telly and preferring to read of an evening would be positively delighted with this assessment!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Blogroll Search

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 03/2006